UX Team Lead
Design sprinting for Defaqto Engage

The challenge
The main problems with Engage were navigation and findability. Users struggled to find their clients, their recent work and their reports. Workflows were long, and Engage connected poorly to other systems.
In 2023 I recommended we bring in external expertise to speed things up. As a team we agreed on Red Badger. We spent an intense six to seven weeks together as a small team, with three people from each side. My job was to turn what we learned into a redesign of the UX and UI of Engage.
Process
Red Badger taught us how to run design sprints. The idea is to solve a problem and test the answer in five days. Ours ran a little longer than five days, but we followed the same five stages.
Map (research internally and with users). We mapped the user journey in Miro and grouped the pain points by stage, such as the annual review and research. We gathered what we already knew inside Defaqto. We also spoke to users. Navigation and findability came up again and again. Reports were big and hard to find, and people could not tell where to go next.
Sketch. Each of us sketched possible solutions. My sketch put a client hub at the centre. It had a Client Hub, a Research Hub, a Document Hub, client search and live chat.
Decide (as a group). We chose to focus the design on a client hub. The aim was to make recent work and clients quick to find.
Prototype. I turned the chosen sketch into wireframes, then into high-fidelity designs in Figma. I made these main choices:
The home page lists recent clients and a "Jump back in" list, so people can return to recent work in one click.
The information architecture is a simple set of tabs on the client record.
Cards, and full-page modals for Plan and Goal, hold most of the information.
The left-hand navigation gives access to better help, live chat and profile options.
We also explored the annual review workflow. This included fund detail that links straight through to research, and saved filters for common filter sets. For this phase, the client hub area is what we delivered.
I annotated the designs so the team could see the reasons behind each choice.
Test (then go round again to refine). We put the prototypes in front of users and wrote down what they said. Then we ran the loop again to improve the designs.
Gallery










Results
Users liked the new structure. They valued the left-hand navigation, the quick link to start an annual review, and the clear path through the system. One said it made things "so much easier to find in Engage". Another said live chat "has saved me so much time". This phase delivered the client hub area.
Key learnings
The sprint taught us to work in a more user-centred way. Much of what we found, we already knew. Now we could prove it with user feedback. We also built a small group of advisers we can go back to and repeat the process with.
Role
UX Team Lead
Category
Engage · UX/UI